|
|
Proof Points...There is a fine distinction between teaching to a student Learning Expectation and teaching to the test. Instruction aimed at helping students meet targeted student learning goals provides a rich and deep learning experience that offers much greater potential for being retained by the student than through approaches whose primary goal is success on the test. The Test Item Analysis is an approach that employs released test items as the starting points for designing standards-based instruction. After the test item is thoroughly analyzed, the focus shifts toward researching the associated Learning Expectation using information found in the national standards documents. The TIA process outlined in STEMresources.com provides a mechanism for developing an engaging standards-based lesson with an accompanying formative assessment.
The Way It Works...The Test Item Analysis (TIA) follows a three-step guided format that employs a number of tools found in STEMresources.com. As with most STEMresources tools, prompts are included to help teachers complete a structured template.
The selected test item is then subjected to a careful review. Teachers identify the major Concepts and Big Ideas that students would need to understand to successfully complete this test item. The requisite process (inquiry or problem solving) skills that are embedded in the test item and the cognitive demand as indicated by the Webb Depth of Knowledge level are identified.
Completing a TIA enables a teacher to forge careful links between standards, assessment, and instruction. STEMresources.com includes a number of Teacher Work Samples that contain instructional materials that were developed through the TIA process. References
Colburn, A. (2009). Multiple choice season. The Science Teacher, 76 (4) 10. DeBoer, G.E. (2005). Standard-izing test items. Science Scope, 1, 10-11. Doane, W.E.J., Rice, R., And Zachos, P. (2006). Knowing when you don’t know. The Science Teacher, 73 (4), 46-49. Hammerman, E. (2005). Linking classroom instruction and assessment to standardized testing. Science Scope, 28 (4), 26-31. Holloway, J.H. (2006). Connecting professional development to student learning gains. The Science Educator, 15 (1), 37-43. Powerful classroom assessments: Examining student thinking. Retrieved on May 11, 2009: www.ncosp.wwu.edu/Resources/AS/Presentation NCOSP%20PCA%20Workshop%202006janfeb.ppt. Solomon, P.G. (2002). The assessment bridge. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
|